GROKLAW
When you want to know more
but don't know where to look.

IANAL. I am a journalist with a paralegal background,
so if you have a legal problem and want advice,
please hire an attorney.


Click to see the XML version of this web page.

Click here to send an email to the editor of this weblog.

Amazon Honor  System Click  Here to Pay Learn More

law.com Dictionary


Best News Site

2004 Linux Journal Editors' Choice Award
Best Nontechnical or Community Website

2003 OSDir.com Editor's Choice Winner
Best News Site


User Functions

Username:

Password:

Don't have an account yet? Sign up as a New User
What's New

STORIES
3 stories in last 48 hours

COMMENTS last 48 hrs

Exhibit H to IBM's Memorand... [+36]
SCO's Memo in Opposition to... [+300]
SCO's Statement of Basis fo... [+13]
SCO's 3rd Quarter Teleconfe...
SCO's Opposition to IBM's M...
DaimlerChrysler Hearing Tra... [+72]
Autozone Files Emergency Mo... [+5]
Sontag Declaration in Suppo...
AutoZone Hearing Set for Se... [+2]
SCO's Shareholder Rights Pl... [+7]
Novell Hearing Will Not Be ... [+4]


Sponsors

Hosting:

hosted by ibiblio

Webmaster: MathFox

The typo was in the case number | 66 comments | Create New Account
Comments belong to whoever posts them. Please notify us of inappropriate comments.
The foundation of Groklaw
Authored by: AllParadox on Thursday, September 02 2004 @ 12:04 PM EDT
IMHO, the reason that TSG is in so much trouble, and Groklaw has been so
effective, is that basic facts are important.

No mortal is omniscient. PJ, as a paralegal, knows to double-check critical
items. It is an art to know which items deserve to be double-checked, because
resources in a law office are scarce.

TSG, on the other hand, may be having trouble in this regard.

---
All is paradox: I no longer practice law, so this is just another layman's
opinion. For a Real Legal Opinion, buy one from a licensed Attorney

[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]

The typo was in the case number
Authored by: al_petrofsky on Thursday, September 02 2004 @ 06:27 PM EDT
If the date was being assigned then either it was a typo or ...

It was a typo in the case number. See Yahoo SCOX messages 175 331 and 175901.

[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]