[This is the text-encoded version posted at scofacts.org of the document whose
image is found here: pdf.
Please notify email@example.com of any discrepancies between this version and the image.
Scofacts is not endorsed by the "SCO Group" Delaware corporation, nor by any of the registered owners of "SCO" trademarks.
RCS revision info:
$Id: DC-appeal-6.html,v 1.3 2005/01/25 22:36:29 al Exp $
IN THE MICHIGAN COURT OF APPEALS ORDER Re: SCO Group Inc v DaimlerChrysler Corp Docket No. 260036 L.C. No. 2004-056587-CK William C. Whitbeck, Chief Judge, acting under MCR 7.203(F)(1) and 7.216(A)(10), orders: The claim of appeal from the December 21, 2004 order of voluntary dismissal is DISMISSED for lack of jurisdiction since this type of order is not a final order that is appealable as a matter of right in view of the fact that "... it does not resolve the merits of the remaining claims and, as such those claims are 'not barred from being resurrected on that docket at some future date.'" City of Detroit v State of Michigan, 262 Mich App 542, 545; 686 NW2d 514 (2004), citing Wickings v Arctic Enterprises, Inc, 244 Mich App 125, 134-136; 624 NW2d 197 (2000). A true copy entered and certified by Sandra Schultz Mengel, Chief Clerk, on JAN 21 2005 [s/ Sandra Schultz Mengel] ----------- -------------------------- Date Chief Clerk STATE OF MICHIGAN E PLURIBUS UNUM [eagle] [elk] TUEBOR [moose] SI QUAERIS PENINSULAM AMOENAM CIRCUMSPICE COURT OF APPEALS