[This is the text-encoded version posted at scofacts.org of the document whose
image is found here: pdf.
Please notify firstname.lastname@example.org of any discrepancies between this version and the image.
Scofacts is not endorsed by the "SCO Group" Delaware corporation, nor by any of the registered owners of "SCO" trademarks.
RCS revision info:
$Id: DC-2004-12-21-B.html,v 1.1 2004/12/24 14:42:02 al Exp $
RECEIVED FOR FILING OAKLAND COUNTY CLERK '04 DEC 21 P1:06 BY: [s/ CEF] ----------------- DEPUTY COUNTY CLERK STATE OF MICHIGAN IN THE CIRCUIT COURT FOR THE COUNTY OF OAKLAND THE SCO GROUP, INC., Plaintiff, vs. DAIMLERCHRYSLER CORPORATION, Defendant. Civil Action No. 04-056587-CKB Honorable Rae Lee Chabot Joel H. Serlin (P20224) Barry M. Rosenbaum (P26487) SEYBURN, KAHN, GINN, BESS AND SERLIN, P.C. Attorneys for Plaintiff 2000 Town Center, Suite 1500 Southfield, MI 48075 (248) 353-7620 James P. Feeney (P13335) Thomas S. Bishoff (P53753) Stephen L. Tupper (P53918) DYKEMA GOSSETT PLLC Attorneys for Defendant 39577 Woodward Avenue, Suite 300 Bloomfield Hills, MI 48304-2820 (248)203-0700 STIPULATED ORDER OF DISMISSAL WITHOUT PREJUDICE At a session of said Court, held in the Oakland County Courthouse in the City of Pontiac, County of Oakland, State of Michigan, on DEC 21 2004 ----------- PRESENT: Hon. Rae Lee Chabot, Circuit Court Judge Upon the stipulation of the parties hereto, through their respective counsel, and the Court being fully advised in the premises; IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Plaintiff The SCO Group, Inc.'s claim for breach of contract for Defendant DaimlerChrysler Corporation's alleged failure to respond to the request for certification in a timely manner is DISMISSED without prejudice. Page 1 of 2
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, in the event Plaintiff The SCO Group, Inc. refiles its claim for breach of contract for Defendant DaimlerChrysler Corporation's alleged failure to respond to the request for certification in a timely manner, Plaintiff shall pay Defendant's costs and reasonable attorneys' fees incurred in the instant action in defending against that claim only, from and after the entry of this Court's August 9, 2004 Order Granting in Part and Denying in Part Defendant DaimlerChrysler Corporation's Motion for Summary Disposition, as a condition precedent to pursuing any such refiled action. The amount of Defendant's costs and reasonable attorneys' fees shall be determined by the Court in the refiled action as soon as practicable after refiling, and Plaintiff shall pay such costs and reasonable attorneys' fees, as are determined by the Court, within 15 days following the Court's decision, as a condition to pursuing the refiled action. Defendant shall not be required to answer or otherwise respond to the complaint in the refiled action until Plaintiff pays the costs and reasonable attorneys' fees described above. THIS ORDER DISPOSES OF THE LAST PENDING CLAIM AND CLOSES THIS CASE. [s/ R L Chabot] --------------- Hon. Rae Lee Chabot Circuit Court Judge SO STIPULATED: [s/ Barry M. Rosenbaum] 12-20-04 -------------------------------- Barry M. Rosenbaum (P26487) Counsel for Plaintiff The SCO Group, Inc. [s/ TSB] 12/17/04 --------------------------------- Thomas S. Bishoff (P53753) Counsel for Defendant DaimlerChrysler Corporation Page 2 of 2