[This is the text-encoded version posted at scofacts.org of the document whose
image is found here: pdf.
Please notify firstname.lastname@example.org of any discrepancies between this version and the image.
Scofacts is not endorsed by the "SCO Group" Delaware corporation, nor by any of the registered owners of "SCO" trademarks.
RCS revision info:
$Id: DC-2004-08-09.html,v 1.1 2004/12/24 14:42:06 al Exp $
RECEIVED FOR FILING OAKLAND COUNTY CLERK '04 AUG -9 P4:16 BY: [s/ CEF] ----------------- DEPUTY COUNTY CLERK STATE OF MICHIGAN IN THE CIRCUIT COURT FOR THE COUNTY OF OAKLAND THE SCO GROUP, INC., Plaintiff, vs. DAIMLERCHRYSLER CORPORATION, Defendant. Civil Action No. 04-056587-CKB Honorable Rae Lee Chabot Joel H. Serlin (P20224) Barry M. Rosenbaum (P26487) SEYBURN, KAHN, GINN, BESS AND SERLIN, P.C. Attorneys for Plaintiff 2000 Town Center, Suite 1500 Southfield, MI 48075 (248) 353-7620 James P. Feeney (P13335) Thomas S. Bishoff (P53753) Stephen L. Tupper (P53918) DYKEMA GOSSETT PLLC Attorneys for Defendant 39577 Woodward Avenue, Suite 300 Bloomfield Hills, MI 48304-2820 (248)203-0700 ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART DEFENDANT DAIMLERCHRYSLER CORPORATION'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY DISPOSITION At a session of said Court, held in the Oakland County Courthouse in the City of Pontiac, County of Oakland, State of Michigan, on AUG 09 2004 ----------- PRESENT: Hon. Rae Lee Chabot, Circuit Court Judge This matter having come before the Court on Defendant DaimlerChrysler Corporation's Motion for Summary Disposition, filed on April 15, 2004; Plaintiff The SCO Group, Inc. having filed a Memorandum of Law and Affidavit of William Broderick in opposition to DaimlerChrysler Corporation's Motion for Summary Disposition on June 16, 2004; Defendant DaimlerChrysler Corporation having filed a Reply Brief in support of its Motion for Summary Page 1 of 2
Disposition on June 30, 2004; and the Court having considered the papers submitted by the parties and hearing argument from their counsel at a duly noticed hearing on July 21, 2004, and being otherwise fully advised in the premises, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Defendant DaimlerChrysler Corporation's Motion for Summary Disposition is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part, such that the Court will grant summary disposition as to all claims except for SCO's claim for breach of contract for DaimlerChrysler's alleged failure to respond to the request for certification in a timely manner, for the reasons stated on the record at the July 21, 2004 hearing. [s/ R L Chabot] --------------- Hon. Rae Lee Chabot Circuit Court Judge AGREED AS TO FORM: [s/ Barry M. Rosenbaum] 8/9/04 ------------------------------ Barry M. Rosenbaum (P26487) Counsel for Plaintiff The SCO Group, Inc. [s/ Thomas S. Bishoff/J--] 8/6/04 --------------------------------- Thomas S. Bishoff (P53753) Counsel for Defendant DaimlerChrysler Corporation Page 2 of 2