[This is the text-encoded version posted at scofacts.org of the document whose image is found here: pdf.
Please notify al@scofacts.org of any discrepancies between this version and the image.
Scofacts is not endorsed by the "SCO Group" Delaware corporation, nor by any of the registered owners of "SCO" trademarks.
RCS revision info: $Id$ ]

COPY

Curran & Parry
ATTORNEYS AT LAW
300 SOUTH FOURTH STREET
SUITE 1201
LAS VEGAS, NEVADA 89101

WILLIAM P. CURRAN
STANLEY W. PARRY
---------------
JOSHUA H. REISMAN
GLENN M. MACHADO

TELEPHONE (702) 471-7000
FACSIMILE (702) 471-7070
E-MAIL curranparry@curranparry.com


December 27, 2004

VIA HAND DELIVERY
-----------------

Hon. Robert C. Jones
United States District Judge
333 S. Las Vegas Blvd.
Las Vegas, NV 89101

Re: The SCO Group, Inc. v. AutoZone, Inc., CV-S-04-0237-RCJ-LRL

Dear Judge Jones:

We write to advise the Court that, in light of developments which have
occurred during the recent 30-day extension of discovery, The SCO
Group, Inc. ("SCO") does not intend to move for a preliminary
injunction in the above-referenced matter at this time.  Instead, the
parties agree that further discovery is necessary and appropriate
before SCO can reach an informed decision.  The parites are in the
process of discussing the appropriate scope of such discovery and are
optimistic that they will be able to reach agreement shortly on this
issue and will proffer an appropriate stipulation at such time.  In
the event the parties cannot reach an agreement, SCO intends to make
an appropriate application to the Court for such additional discovery.
We will keep the Court apprised of the progress of these discussions.

We thank the Court for its courtesy with respect to this matter.


Respectfully submitted,

[s/ Stanley W. Parry]

Stanley W. Parry, Esq.


DSS:eb

cc: David J. Stewart, Esq.
    James J. Pisanelli, Esq.
    David S. Stone, Esq.


Y:\Sco\Autozone\Letters\Jones re prelim inj 12-27-04.wpd